User Comments and Reported Phone Numbers

Following are the comments and the phone numbers reported by users. If you have received an unwanted call, you can report the mobile number here. Please use following "Reverse Lookup Tool" to trace and report a phone number.

Reverse Lookup Tool

17th Jan 2017

This person fraud with many people.
Caller Name: Ramesh
Caller Type: Other
Report Post

16th Jan 2017

This Num is completely scam
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

24th Dec 2016

He is a fraud man
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

24th Dec 2016

He is a painter never trust him.He will take the money and abscond
Caller Name: Kuppuswamy
Caller Type: Other
Report Post

23rd Dec 2016

He is missing from Kolhapur
Caller Name: Rohit Oswal
Caller Type: Other
Report Post

22nd Dec 2016

He is doing Fraud casting Calls
Caller Name: Anvesh
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

22nd Dec 2016

9096298453- rude and harrasing unknown call
Caller Name: Unknown
Caller Type: Unidentified
Report Post

20th Dec 2016

Reportedly calling from bank head office, giving reference of RBI instructions
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

19th Dec 2016

Called to activate blocked ATM card.
Caller Name: Unknown
Caller Type: Credit Card Scam
Report Post

17th Dec 2016

He is fake..
Caller Name: Vodafone
Caller Type: Unidentified
Report Post

16th Dec 2016

He is cheater he done so many scams in ap and telagana his son also doing and govt job at tirupathi
Caller Name: Baskarao
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

16th Dec 2016

Scamming about depositing 8700 INR to get a card. Was giving benefits about some card. But was trying to extract out about 8700 to 10000 INR. Was asking for an email id to generate the invoice for that number. the call was from +91 9268001301
Caller Name: Did Not Give
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

15th Dec 2016

He is idot
Caller Name: Dfgh
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

15th Dec 2016

The above person-Rajvir Rathod- as informed by him introdued me as Investigation Officer, Crime Branch, Delhi. His intention was to cheat us. One more person with No.9879694702 introducing himself as Mr. Mallik, Advocate, is also seems associated with him.
Caller Name: Rajvir Rathod
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

14th Dec 2016

He is very dangerous person his tell me I KILL YOU.....!
Caller Name: Dashrath Sudhakar
Caller Type: Unidentified
Report Post

14th Dec 2016

A lady called & was asking for details of my credit card. When asked why she needs such details from the customer & these details bank already has & not supposed to ask., she cut the call.
Caller Name: Icici Bank
Caller Type: Credit Card Scam
Report Post

14th Dec 2016

Doubtful number
Caller Name: Unknown
Caller Type: Choose Caller Type
Report Post

13th Dec 2016

More details to come
Caller Name: Provide Details
Caller Type: Text Message
Report Post

13th Dec 2016

He is taking money on the name of shine.com for interviews and jobs.
Caller Name: Adnan Thane
Caller Type: Scam
Report Post

13th Dec 2016

I have a doubt. He was selling me an insurance policy of exide life insurance
Caller Name: Aditya Saxena
Caller Type: Marketing
Report Post

« Page 1 of 106 pages, displaying 1-20 of 2114 results »

Find Details of Mobile Service Area: Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Rajasthan | Madhya Pradesh Chhattisgarh | Kerala | Haryana | Maharashtra | West Bengal | Bihar Jharkhand | Assam | UP West | Mumbai | Gujarat | Delhi NCR | Jammu Kashmir | UP East | Kolkata | Orissa | North East | Punjab | Chennai | Tamil Nadu | Tamil Nadu Telecom Circle (includes Pondichery except Yanam, usually excludes Chennai, MEPZ, Mahabalipuram & Minjur) | Karnataka Telecom Circle. | Orissa Telecom Circle. | Haryana Telecom Circle (excludes Faridabad, Gurgaon & Panchkula) | Andhra Pradesh Telecom Circle. | Mumbai Metro Telecom Circle (includes Navi Mumbai & Kalyan) | Bihar & Jharkhand Telecom Circle. | Uttar Pradesh (East) Telecom Circle. | Maharashtra Telecom Circle.
Disclaimer: We do not reveal the exact location of the number for individual security reasons. Due to Mobile Number Portability (MNP), we cannot assure that the Network Operator shown on this website for a number would be still right. But the location of the traced number would be the same even if the user might have opted for MNP.